This post is Grassroots, meaning a reader posted it directly. If you see an issue with it, contact an editor.
If you’d like to post a Grassroots post, click here!

July 29, 2021

The Art & Science of Creativity

Photo by Olga Lioncat on Pexels.

Thomas Edison was an artist that had an art studio in Menlo Park, California. Yes, I know what you are thinking; Edison was a scientist, not an artist. And as a society, we have learnt to treat these two entities, very differently. But the processes they use are, in fact very similar. In fact, both are united in a kind of shared curiosity, a sense of inquiry; one conscripted by an unrelenting protocol and the other conceived from an expansive abyss like imagination. Art, often the result of individual expression or an attempt to make sense of the world that surrounds an artist. Science, on the other hand, claims the ability to find a somewhat irrefutable truth.

Human beings like Thomas Edison redefined what it meant to be a scientist. Like many others that came before him and continued to after, he teased the boundaries that separate science from art. Because our understanding of the world is based on how we have learnt to identify it. Our knowledge, primarily defined by our own consciousness; from imagery created based within our own worlds. I remember as a young boy in high school, the pressure that some of my friends felt to pursue a career in the sciences, simply because their parents wanted them to. Young men, that were talented in what was defined as conventional art — painting and sculpting. Yet they were always told that being an artist would be far less successful than being a scientist. Success, as of course measured by monetary gains, rather than profits made by producing one’s most passionate work. But science is, in fact, an art form.

There is a myth that one must play an instrument or paint colours onto an easel to display a sense of creativity. But the truth is anyone that produces a gargantuan amount of work regardless of whether it involves palette, pizzicato, penicillin or pasteurisation is an artist. All of these individuals followed processes similar to the rules of the scientific method. The underlying trait amongst individuals, whether they practice art or science, is creativity. It takes a creative genius to produce a masterpiece on an easel. But equally, it takes years of the same ability and focuses, in envisaging the double-helical structure of the elementary stuff of life.

The problem is that creativity is hard to describe or measure. There is no tangible scale to label what it is and isn’t. At times looking somewhat erratic with a haphazard presence yet at other times a sudden flicker that has taken years of leverage. It mostly involves working tirelessly towards an end that at times may not exist. In fact, it seldom contains a clear path, often asking its seekers to approach the world with inquisitiveness to see what experiences ensue. Usually, it involves using one’s own life experiences to adapt to ideas and dreams. A collaboration of questions from one’s own thoughts to provide solutions. In Edison’s case, his personal post-war life experience surrounded by death, peoples desire to question an afterlife and how to communicate with the dead, led him to formulate the phonograph. In an interview with Scientific American, he was quoted as:

“I don’t claim that our personalities pass on to another existence or sphere. I don’t claim anything because I don’t know anything about the subject; for that matter, no human being knows. But I do claim that it is possible to construct an apparatus which will be so delicate that if there are personalities in another existence or sphere who wish to get in touch with us in this existence or sphere, this apparatus will at least give them a better opportunity to express themselves than the tilting tables and raps and ouija boards and mediums and the other crude methods now purported to be the only means of communication…”

Quite simply, it was the ouija board, a contraption that claimed to provide the ability to communicate with those who had “passed over,” which first attracted his attention. And because it was not scientific enough, something better was needed, and he began to devise it. This was a classic example of the power of introversion, that allowed Edison to expand the boundaries of what was possible. And while a vision can drive one forward; left too small or rigid it can hold one back. Edison’s for a phonograph, however, was expansive enough to accommodate the idea of an ouija board to improve upon. Creativity is not reserved for geniuses, it impacts us all daily. It is just that we do not see ourselves creating. Yet all we need do is look back over the ten years of our own individual lives.

February of 1994 — a group of seven friends, decided to travel and camp for a month. It was mostly a trip to disappear from the world into the wild of Southern Baja. One of the young men spent most of the time when he was not surfing sketching in a little pad he carried with him — shells, sea life, shipwrecks in the distance. And he would spend most of his time, accumulating bits of beach muck, and liberating sea life from the scum line. An unassuming marine biologist by the name of Steve with a generous smile never missed a chance to catch some waves. The group mostly spent their long beautiful days, surfing and fishing. Other days on end they would spend camping from Ensenada to Todos Santos, east around Baja’s southern tip into the Sea of Cortez.

Evenings were spent around campsites with guitars, harmonicas and songs. Steve would never miss a chance to show off his sketches from the day. His drawings were rough yet recognitory, but mostly pure fun. Despite his quick and natural sense of humour, he was unable to convince his friends that he would have a successful career as a cartoonist. That his drawings of a sea sponge would remain in the pages of his sketchbook forever. Yet almost a decade later SpongeBob Squarepants became a household name and was part of most of our lives. It took Stephen Hillenberg, a marine biologist who spent time around a campfire drawing sketches of a sedentary sponge a decade to develop the idea. Often, we assume creativity requires a brand new approach never before seen by the world. But in Hillenberg’s a spark of an idea from something that existed simply in another form was able to become something huge with good old hard work, persistence, and creativity. By day Hillenberg was a scientist hard at work. But his sinews were made of the creative flair that in the traditional sense, only an artist would be said to have.

I watched in awe at my 9-month-old nephew trying to hold the couch and support himself on his legs. He fell down at least a dozen times, but he kept trying. When he finally held himself up, he looked up excitedly with a Cheshire grin of accomplishment. Here was an intoxicating sense about an excited child. As his grin widened, it made me smile. He had been an explorer trying to test his own leg’s strength. The primordial instinct to seek and be curious. This simple inquisitiveness is the innate drive we all have to be creative. The artists within us all are the ones that first learn to draw stick figures of our own families with. The scientists within, the ones that teach us how to bear the weight of our little bodies on our equally short legs; each attempt an experiment to improve efficiency to achieve the optimal outcome.
Yet, by the time we reach adulthood, society has diagnosed creativity a rare and precious gene; offering an almost exalted status to those that have simply developed skills and a zeal, to take chances and learn more about their art. Driving out the Edison and Hillenberg within us all. Instead, conferring within us an inability to forgive ourselves for the multiple and repeated attempts that did not work. In fact, when asked about his failed inventions, Edison once said:

I have not failed. I’ve just found 10,000 ways that won’t work.

The ideology that creativity is a rare talent reserved to only a few in itself keeps us from realising that all of us simply express creativity differently. Some of us are brilliant at working out excel spreadsheets, others, make excellent doctors. Some of us can build a house from scratch, while others can pick a good investment from a pile of rubble. There is, in fact, an art form to everything we do. One borne of methodical rigour, akin to the scientific process.

In our daily lives, we perceive and imagine what could be and use our individual skillsets to pursue our imagination. So today at work will you be an artist or a scientist. Most importantly, what will you go out there and create today…
Leave a Thoughtful Comment

Read 0 comments and reply

Top Contributors Latest

Venkatesh Bhardwaj  |  Contribution: 2,935